Aiming for Efficiency


PolyWorks® Helps Oil Field Equipment Manufacturer Cut Motor Component Inspection Time in Half.


Weatherford International Ltd. is one of the world’s largest and most dynamic oilfield service companies. Headquartered in Houston, the company employs more than 34,000 people worldwide, operating in more than 710 locations and in more than 100 countries around the world. The company’s Edmonton, AB, Canada facility designs and manufactures two products for petroleum production operations—progressing cavity pumps used in the production of oil after the well is drilled, and fluid power sections. 

The Challenge

To meet the demands of the booming world oil and gas drilling industry, Weatherford has ramped up production and with it the need to improve the efficiency of their inspection operations.

Weatherford products support operations by major petroleum producing companies throughout the world. The company’s Edmonton, Alberta facility designs and manufactures two products for petroleum production operations—progressing cavity pumps used in the production of oil after the well is drilled and fluid power sections. The fluid power section is the motor that provides the power to drill the well. To help improve production efficiency, the company sought a new, more efficient way to inspect fluid power sections, which have a very complex geometry and are difficult to inspect using traditional methods. 


Fluid power section.

In the past, the company had established a procedure that required four people—one from manufacturing, one from quality control and two from engineering—to dimensionally inspect the fluid power sections after machining. The inspection process for these large, helically curved components—some nearly 20 feet in length—took approximately one hour to gather the dimensional data and manually compare it to the original design created in CAD software. Machine offsets were relayed to the shop floor, where changes were made in the machining process. Another section of the same component was machined, and the inspection process was repeated on this section to determine if the corrections had improved the dimensional accuracy of the workpiece.

"This was a very time consuming process. Plus, we had to restrict our inspection operations to normal business hours since that was when the engineering department was available to compare the measured geometry with the CAD drawing," Wayne Pilgrim, Weatherford Senior, Project Engineer. 

The Solution

In 2005, the company re-evaluated its approach to inspecting these parts with the object of finding a more efficient method of gathering and analyzing dimensional data. Part of that program was the installation of PolyWorks® 3D metrology software from InnovMetric Software, a full-featured metrology software that automates and streamlines many of the operations associated with gathering and comparing dimensional data with design intent.

 

"Operators have found PolyWorks easy to use. The automated features of the software really set it apart." Travis Chometsky, Weatherford Product Designer

 

The PolyWorks|Inspector™ software solution is used in conjunction with a FARO Laser Line probe mounted on a high precision Faro Platinum Arm. The hardware/software combination cut inspection and analysis time in half and reduced the number of people required for the operation from four to two. In addition, the manufacturing group can now operate independently and work a 24-hour per day shift.

 

Collecting Point Cloud Data

In practice, the FARO Laser Line probe collects dimensional data at a rate of up to 19,200 points per second. In the 10 to 15 minutes of the inspection routine for the Weatherford fluid power sections, a point cloud of millions of data points is collected to create a highly detailed dimensional picture of a part feature.

“We let the PolyWorks software do the work—the mathematics—of determining how to take the proper cross section,” Pilgrim said. “Because of its auto alignment capabilities, PolyWorks software assures consistent results, eliminating operator influence during data gathering.”

The company uses an in-process inspection approach on a batch basis. “For example, if a batch of five parts is being produced, operators will perform the PolyWorks / FARO Laser Line probe inspection process on the first piece and then use the same CNC program to make the next four with no PolyWorks / Faro laser inspection,” said Pilgrim. “We inspect the finished product only if it is considered questionable by other inspection methods.”

The inspection process for the fluid power section components is always the same. After the first machining cut on a new fluid power section model, a raw data point cloud is collected through the 3D scanning process. From the point cloud, the PolyWorks software creates a mesh that is loaded into the PolyWorks|Inspector module. Using PolyWorks’ data-to-CAD alignment techniques, the operator aligns the mesh with the reference object, a ProENGINEER file imported into PolyWorks, to register both models in the same coordinate system. Once perfectly aligned, the operator specifies a cross-section where the data-to-CAD comparisons need to be performed. 


Alignment of multiple scan passes.


PolyWorks mesh model.

The Benefits

For each cross-section selected, PolyWorks automatically compares the data model to the reference (CAD) model and computes a series of measurements including: standard deviation, max error, min error, etc. PolyWorks also creates a PDF report of the results of the data-to-CAD comparison. From this report, the machine operator makes adjustments. Another section is machined and scanned again to determine if the adjustments have brought it closer to design intent.

"You don’t need a lot of programming experience to be able to quickly set up a process. The macro programming language is easy to use and records actions in a command window. We’ve shown that this approach to inspection can save time and money in manufacturing operations and we’re ready to help other departments implement this approach as well,"  stated Chometsky. Thanks to powerful macro-programming capabilities, operators do not have to manually perform all of the alignment and comparison tasks in PolyWorks for each new part. In one mouse click, the complete inspection process, from alignment to comparison and report generation, can be automatically performed for every section that is scanned.

Choose your location and language

Choose your location

Afghanistan

Åland Islands

Albania

Algeria

American Samoa

Andorra

Angola

Anguilla

Antarctica

Antigua and Barbuda

Argentina

Armenia

Aruba

Australia

Austria

Azerbaijan

Bahamas

Bahrain

Bangladesh

Barbados

Belarus

Belgium

Belize

Benin

Bermuda

Bhutan

Bolivia, Plurinational State of

Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Botswana

Bouvet Island

Brazil

British Indian Ocean Territory

Brunei Darussalam

Bulgaria

Burkina Faso

Burundi

Cambodia

Cameroon

Canada

Cape Verde

Cayman Islands

Central African Republic

Chad

Chile

China

Christmas Island

Cocos (Keeling) Islands

Colombia

Comoros

Congo

Congo, The Democratic Republic of the

Cook Islands

Costa Rica

Côte d'Ivoire

Croatia

Cuba

Curaçao

Cyprus

Czech Republic

Denmark

Djibouti

Dominica

Dominican Republic

Ecuador

Egypt

El Salvador

Equatorial Guinea

Eritrea

Estonia

Ethiopia

Falkland Islands (Malvinas)

Faroe Islands

Fiji

Finland

France

French Guiana

French Polynesia

French Southern Territories

Gabon

Gambia

Georgia

Germany

Ghana

Gibraltar

Greece

Greenland

Grenada

Guadeloupe

Guam

Guatemala

Guernsey

Guinea

Guinea-Bissau

Guyana

Haiti

Heard Island and McDonald Islands

Holy See (Vatican City State)

Honduras

Hong Kong

Hungary

Iceland

India

Indonesia

Iran, Islamic Republic of

Iraq

Ireland

Isle of Man

Israel

Italy

Jamaica

Japan

Jersey

Jordan

Kazakhstan

Kenya

Kiribati

Korea, Democratic People's Republic of

Korea, Republic of

Kuwait

Kyrgyzstan

Lao People's Democratic Republic

Latvia

Lebanon

Lesotho

Liberia

Libya

Liechtenstein

Lithuania

Luxembourg

Macao

Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of

Madagascar

Malawi

Malaysia

Maldives

Mali

Malta

Marshall Islands

Martinique

Mauritania

Mauritius

Mayotte

Mexico

Micronesia, Federated States of

Moldova, Republic of

Monaco

Mongolia

Montenegro

Montserrat

Morocco

Mozambique

Myanmar

Namibia

Nauru

Nepal

Netherlands

Netherlands Antilles

New Caledonia

New Zealand

Nicaragua

Niger

Nigeria

Niue

Norfolk Island

Northern Mariana Islands

Norway

Oman

Pakistan

Palau

Palestine, State of

Panama

Papua New Guinea

Paraguay

Peru

Philippines

Pitcairn

Poland

Portugal

Puerto Rico

Qatar

Réunion

Romania

Russian Federation

Rwanda

Saint Barthélemy

Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha

Saint Kitts and Nevis

Saint Lucia

Saint Martin (French part)

Saint Pierre and Miquelon

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Samoa

San Marino

São Tomé and Príncipe

Saudi Arabia

Senegal

Serbia

Seychelles

Sierra Leone

Singapore

Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Slovakia

Slovenia

Solomon Islands

Somalia

South Africa

South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands

South Sudan

Spain

Sri Lanka

Sudan

Suriname

Svalbard and Jan Mayen

Swaziland

Sweden

Switzerland

Syrian Arab Republic

Taiwan, Province of China

Tajikistan

Tanzania, United Republic of

Thailand

Timor-Leste

Togo

Tokelau

Tonga

Trinidad and Tobago

Tunisia

Türkiye

Turkmenistan

Turks and Caicos Islands

Tuvalu

Uganda

Ukraine

United Arab Emirates

United Kingdom

United States

United States Minor Outlying Islands

Uruguay

Uzbekistan

Vanuatu

Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of

Viet Nam

Virgin Islands, British

Virgin Islands, U.S.

Wallis and Futuna

Western Sahara

Yemen

Zambia

Zimbabwe

Choose your language

Confirm